Brownian motion

around the essentials…

 

Problem with shaping vlan-tagged traffic on linux bridge

Update: there are no any problem with vlans in classifiers, that was my fault.

Have been playing with shapers and run into such a problem: u32 classifier does not work (?) for tagged traffic on «non-tagged» linux bridge.

In more details:

Test bed:

Let’s take three linux boxes. One will be two-ports switch (SW), on two another (BoxA and BoxB) we will configure IP addresses 172.17.2.10/24 and 172.17.2.11/24, for example.

So.. For the beginning BoxA should ping BoxB on crossover cable.

Building bridge:

brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth1
ip link set up dev br0

Now BoxA should successfully ping BoxB through this switch.

Configuring shaper:

DEV=eth0
#
# QDisc:
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 200
#
# root class:
tc class add dev $DEV classid 1:10 parent 1:0 htb rate 100Mbit
#
# default class:
tc class add dev $DEV classid 1:200 parent 1:10 htb rate 1Mbit
#
# клас для тестового трафіка:
tc class add dev $DEV classid 1:100 parent 1:10 htb rate 10Mbit
#
# фільтр для тестового трафіка:
tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 100 u32 match ip dst 172.17.2.10 flowid 1:100

Check — BoxA should ping BoxB, and this traffic should be in class 1:100, this can be verified by tc -s class show dev $DEV.

Configuring vlan subinterfaces:

Now on boxes A and B we remove addresses from interfaces and put them on sub-interfaces:

ip addr del 172.17.2.10/24 brd 172.17.2.255 dev eth0
#
vconfig add eth0.100
ip link set up dev eth.100
#
# на іншому "боксі" буде .11/24, відповідно:
ip addr add 172.17.2.10/24 brd 172.17.2.255 dev eth0.100

Switch’s configuration remains unchanged.

Now BoxA still can ping BoxB, but this traffic is in the default class, 1:10, instead of 1:100.

The value of REORDER_HDR does not matter.

This is the problem.

What is wrong?

Some considerations:

  1. u32 classifier takes «offset» counting from the beginning of IP packet.
  2. vlan tag should not mess IP related code…

Is any of these wrong?

I’ve mentioned, i’m not a programmer :-)

(No Ratings Yet)

4 коментарі to “Problem with shaping vlan-tagged traffic on linux bridge”

  1. […] проблеми із HTB шейпером 802.1Q трафіка на linux bridge — це була моя помилка […]

  2. Garry says:

    Not sure, I’ve just recently been researching tc/bridges/VLANs, but maybe on your bridge, eth0 is for untagged packets, yet the traffic you’re sending is now tagged. So it doesn’t match your tc rules.

  3. flyff gold says:

    Good article – plenty of food for thought.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: Можете використовувати такі теґи: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Recent Posts

Tags

Archives